Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Twentysomething: Making time for a blog and a full-time job

blogging tips

 
 

Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:

 
 

via Brazen Careerist by Penelope Trunk by Penelope Trunk on Aug 28, 2007

By Ryan Healy - For the past six months I have been maintaining my blog, Employee Evolution. At this point I realize that the decision to start a blog is hard, but writing regularly is harder. So here is a list of tactics I've used to maintain a full-time, corporate job along side a full-time blog.

Be Realistic
Before I started Employee Evolution, I did a little research and realized four posts was a minimum. I also realized there was no way in hell I could maintain a 45-hour-a-week job and create a successful blog without completely stressing out.

One night during one of many career conversation with my good friend Ryan Paugh, I had one of those "ah ha" moments. I asked if he wanted to create a joint blog, and he immediately agreed. Now I can write four posts a week, but two is sufficient if it's a busy week at work. Being realistic before starting has allowed my blog to continue growing six months later. And I am stress free, kind of.

Know when you are the most creative
Coming up with ideas for blog posts takes a good amount of creativity. I have my creative moments, but I would never be mistaken for a creative genius. This lack of creativity has caused me to pinpoint the times when, for whatever reason, I am able to tap into my right brain.

I usually have great ideas in the shower. I'm not sure if it's the water waking me up or the clear head from a good night sleep, but some of the best ideas seem to come in the shower.

The shower is great, but nothing beats a long run to get my creative juices flowing. The time from when I stop running to when I walk into my apartment is like a one-man brainstorming session. I realized this about two months ago, and ever since I have increased the length of my runs so I can stop about a mile from my apartment. Often I forget half of everything by the time I stop sweating and grab a pen and paper, but half of those interesting ideas are always better than none.

Create deadlines
Creating deadlines is crucial to getting blog posts completed. I have been unbelievably lucky that I have a weekly deadline for Brazen Careerist. But if you aren't accountable to someone else, it can be easy to slack off. Create your own deadlines and hold yourself accountable. Sure it takes some self control, but it's good for you. I make sure to have at least one post finished before Monday morning roles around. If it's not done, I skip Entourage and write until it's done.

Another option is to ask someone to create a deadline for you. Because I know the value of having a weekly deadline imposed by someone else, I am able to push my partner, Ryan Paugh to complete one post by Sunday night as well. This is a self imposed deadline by him, but he also feels accountable to me. And no matter who you are, it's much easier to get something done when someone else is relying on you.

Don't forget why you're blogging
Everyone starts a blog for a different reason. Some start a blog to share their subject matter expertise on a given topic, some start a blog to share all their crazy ideas with the world and others of us blog about a subject because it could lead to new, exciting opportunities. I fall in the latter group, and I constantly remind myself of this.

It's okay to skip a day
We all have times we simply cannot write well or are to busy with work to write a good post. Don't put up a bad post. Quantity is good, but quality is king. Chances are your readers won't even notice a missed day. Just make sure it doesn't turn into a pattern.

Ryan Healy's blog is Employee Evolution.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Screenshot Tour: Show Us Your Go Bag

 
 

Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:

 
 

via Lifehacker by Adam Pash on Aug 16, 2007

go-bag-head.png
On Monday we asked you to send us pictures of your "go bag," and submit your did. There was a good amount of debate over proper terminology (is it a purse, satchel, man bag, murse, urban assault bag?), but in the end we received a whole lot of great submissions. Whatever you want to call it, today we're taking a look at the bag full of gadgets and productivity tools you throw over your shoulder as you head out the door, confident that you've got everything you need to get things done.


Lifehacker photo gallery thumbnails require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click here to see the Show Us Your Go Bag photo gallery in a Javascript-enabled web browser.

Most of the submissions are accompanied by incredibly detailed descriptions of their contents, so if you see a bag full of goodies that you like, check the description--chances are you can find out whatever you want to know. We had a lot of great submissions, but to highlight just a few of my favorites, you should definitely check out:

Apart from those, I was particularly impressed with our readers' general good sense of style--you all had some very nice looking bags.

Due to the short lead time I gave readers to submit their bags, and because it's a blast looking through your stuff, I'm going to be taking submissions for at least one more week. If you didn't have time to submit yours this week, now's your chance to get it in for next week. Just remember to follow the submission guidelines.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Monday, August 13, 2007

Redefining the sofabed

More than meets the eye!

 
 

Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:

 
 

via LifeRemix All on Aug 11, 2007

Sofabeds are wonderful space-savers, but this is ridiculous.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Thursday, August 9, 2007

Why Store Info When You Can Just Search For It?

Search engine as second brain!

 
 

Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:

 
 

via Techdirt by Mike Masnick on Aug 09, 2007

With plenty of companies trying to jump into the search space and take away Google's lead with something "different," it's interesting to note that many people may not realize how people really use search engines. WebProNews is highlighting a new study suggesting that many people use search engines as an alternative to filing away info. That is, they repeat queries all the time, just to find info that they had found before. In fact, 40% of all search queries are repeats. That's probably a lot more than most people imagined -- and it suggests that people are looking at search engines even more as a "second brain" to store info, rather than just as a way to find new information. Why bookmark something when it's probably easier and faster for Google to just find it for you again? Of course, such activities can be dangerous if the search results change, potentially "erasing" the link to a bit of information someone wanted. That's why it's also interesting to note that Google, at least, is now experimenting with a feature to let you store specific links in your own personalized Google results, guaranteeing that they'll be there the next time you search.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Tuesday, August 7, 2007

5 Steps to taming materialism, from an accidental expert

Interesting perspective here. I'm not sure I can throw away everything I have, but after spending the weekend cleaning the basement, I could definitely be doing better at this.

 
 

Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:

 
 

via Brazen Careerist by Penelope Trunk by Penelope Trunk on Aug 07, 2007

When I was a kid, there was money everywhere. My great grandpa was a lawyer for the Chicago mob in the 1920s, and today, my dad's generation is still living off that money. Sometimes I wonder if the key to being able to squash materialism is to have a lot of it as a kid. I'm not sure. But let me tell you this: I grew up with a laundress and a housekeeper and unlimited cash from a drawer in the dining room.

When I went to college my parents cut off my money. I think this might have been normal at the time. I remember crying, really crying over the fact that I'd never be able to shop at Lord & Taylor. But it didn't take long for me to see that people don't wear Lord & Taylor skirts to class. In fact, I realized that most people don't wear Lord & Taylor skirts anywhere because some of those skirts could feed a family for a month.

1. Test the meaning of money by doing stuff that's scary.
One of the first things I did after college was sell three strings of pearls to get myself to Los Angeles. It was really scared when I did it, but in fact, the only time I missed those pearls was when my mom asked where they were.

When I was making a lot of money, I had great work clothes and BMW (hey, I lived in LA), but that was about it, in terms of splurging. I kept an inexpensive apartment and people used to tell me I was nuts to live there when I had so much money. They told me I was uncomfortable with success, and I worried they were right, but I stayed there. In hindsight, I realize it felt safe to live somewhere I could afford if my company went bankrupt. Which it did.

2. Put a bunch of stuff in storage to see what it's like.
When I moved from Los Angeles to New York City my husband and I rented a 500-square-foot apartment. We told ourselves we'd only be there for a year, until we got more settled in the city. So we put all our books in storage, most of our furniture, clothes that were not in season and everything we wouldn't be using in the next three or four months.

The only way I could put the stuff in storage was to tell myself I could go back and forth every week getting stuff I missed. We ended up staying there six years. We took almost nothing out of storage.

I quote Daniel Gilbert all the time about how we can adapt to anything. Gilbert says that we think some changes will be terrible - like losing a limb-but in fact we are great at adapting to circumstances that don't change. This is true of putting stuff in storage. You quickly learn to live without it.

3. Understand the concept of aspirational clutter. Get reality and throw stuff out.
When we had a baby, we thought we would move for sure, but 9/11 was too traumatic. It didn't feel like the right time to move. So we threw stuff out, and we learned a lot about how what you keep in your small apartment is a statement about your values.

So much of what we hold on to is what we wish we were using -- objects that commemorate a life we aspire to but do not have. The six books we bought a year ago and haven't read, for example. We don't want to admit that we're not making time to read, so we save them. The treadmill is another object that is loaded because if you throw it out you're admitting to yourself that you're never going to use it. Keeping it, even unused, maintains your dream of getting into shape.

In fact, we had to think very hard about every single thing we let into the apartment, and we instituted a rule that if you brought something in, you had to take something out. Maybe other New Yorkers in small spaces had this rule, too, because there is always really good stuff left on doorsteps in New York City.

Then we had another baby. And that was it. With four people living in 500 square feet, I started having recurring dreams about living in a bigger space and I'd wake up to be disappointed that it was only a dream. I decided the small space was driving me crazy, and I started compiling research about where to move.

4. Know this: You could dump everything if you had to.
And then we got bed bugs. We didn't know that much about them but we captured a bug and checked it on the Internet. When I left the landlord a message to tell him we had bed bugs, our usually completely inaccessible landlord called me ten times in one day. I should have known we were in big trouble.

In fact, our whole building had bed bugs, and maybe the whole city. There is a lot written about bed bugs. There is an epidemic in the United States at all levels of the economic spectrum. (Our bed bug expert said that the worst clients he had were up and down Park Avenue because they felt they had been assaulted by the dirty, underclass.)

Bed bugs bite you in your sleep. We had two kids under four years old, and I started staying up all night keeping the bugs off them. Finally the landlord paid for a hotel (about $300 a night in NYC) while we negotiated with him about what to do.

The bugs and their eggs could be in anything in the apartment made of fabric or wood. Here's how long the bugs can live without food: eighteen months. There is no way we could starve them. We had to poison them. And the only way to do that is to get them to come out of hiding and walk through the poison. The only thing they'll come out for is human blood.

How would they get human blood? We had to live in the apartment. What do people on Park Avenue do? The staff lives there while the family goes to the summer home or a hotel. What do the not-rich people do? Use themselves as bait. That's what our neighbors did.

We tried using ourselves as bait for one night, and every bug (by now there were forty or fifty a night) went for the kids. I developed near complete insomnia, always fearing that the kids were getting bitten as soon as I shut my eyes, even in broad daylight when the bugs are asleep.

The bed bug expert said that the most common thing he sees is that people move, but they won't give up their stuff, so they take the bedbugs with them. We had two kids bitten everywhere. We took no chances and we took with us only things that could be boiled in hot in water or thrown in a hot dryer - to ensure no bugs. We took from that apartment less than half of the size of a small U-Haul truck. We left almost everything.

5. Throwing stuff out is not wasteful.
In Madison, we started with just about nothing. Sort of like college kids. You think that throwing everything out is so costly and such a waste of money. But in fact it taught us how little we needed most of the stuff we had, which made us buy much less going forward.

While we have bought a lot since we got here, the years in New York City taught us about living in a small footprint (we still have one of the smallest two bedrooms around) and losing all our stuff to the bed bugs taught us that we didn't really need much after all.

People often ask me how was I able to switch careers so many times (professional volleyball, corporate marketing, entrepreneurship...) And how have I been able to do so many high risk things (for example take a 70% pay cut and start new as a freelance writer when I had my first baby and was supporting the family.) The answer is that I had very little to lose.

It's a cliché for a reason. If you have a very low-cost lifestyle and very few physical things that you treasure, you cannot really imagine a rug being pulled out from under you because you don't own that great a rug anyway.

People think that what's holding them back from taking risk is some big financial idea of stability and well being, but it's really fear of losing your comfortable material life, whatever that is. Mine is so spare that I can easily replace it. even if we got bed bugs again.

Which we won't. Because we had our new house treated before we moved in; even big risk takers draw the line somewhere.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Saturday, July 28, 2007

"Death's Head" by David Gunn

 
 

Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:

 
 

via Fantasy Book Critic by Robert on Jul 25, 2007

Official "Death's Head" Myspace
Order "Death's Head" HERE
Read An Excerpt HERE
Watch the "Death's Head" Video HERE

Part science fiction, part military procedure, a sprinkle of cyberpunk and a whole lot of ass-kicking, David Gunn's "Death's Head" is an irresistibly fun debut novel that reminded me of a cross between Neal Asher's Ian Cormac books, Richard K. Morgan's "Broken Angels" and Glen Cook's Black Company novels with a hefty dose of videogame inspiration thrown into the mix--think Halo, Gears of War, StarCraft, Doom and Half-Life.

Taking place in a far distant future where Earth is but a myth, 85% of the known galaxy is governed by the utopian-like United Free, and the other 15% is fought over between the Enlightened and the Octovians, "Death's Head" follows Sven Tveskoeg, an ex-légionnaire handpicked by the Emperor of the Octovians to become an elite Death's Head soldier serving under General Indigo Jaxx. First though, the 28-year-old has to pass a series of tests to prove his loyalty & abilities. Once that is done, Lt. Tveskoeg is thrown into the middle of the war between the Octovians and the Enlightened, which will stretch our 'hero's' limits to the breaking point. There's a few other things going on as well, some minor subplots, a drop of intrigue, but for the most part, "Death's Head" is basically 368 pages of non-stop shooting, killing, sex, cussing and blowing up things. Not exactly complicated reading, but then again, it's not meant to be.

As far as the characterization, "Death's Head" is narrated in a first-person point-of-view by our 'hero' Sven Tveskoeg. Like the plot, Sven is not very complex. He's full of cynicism, ruthless and a very proficient killer who likes his booze & women. Definitely not what you would call an ideal role model ;) On the other hand, Sven does seems to enjoy playing the "knight in shining armor" and is loyal to a fault, so perhaps there's more to him than meets the eye. Without a doubt Lt. Tveskoeg is much better developed than the book's other characters who are mainly one-dimensional stereotypes that are primarily there so Sven has someone to interact with. There were a couple of interesting personalities among the auxiliaries, but basically this area of the book is not one of the author's strong points.

What I did like about Sven though was his straightforward approach and the way the narrative reflected his personality. So, instead of excessive exposition, brainy vocabulary (the author makes some funny references regarding this), thoughtful meditation or the examination of motives, the story is simple and to the point. The flipside with all of this is that there's just not enough information given to the reader, which was probably the biggest problem I had with the book. Details on the war, on the different species/planets we meet up with, on some of the book's scientific applications, the characters' backgrounds, etc., are hard to come by. Heck, some relevant information wasn't even given until the latter half of the novel, which could easily have been provided at the beginning. Of course there's a simple explanation right? Well, based on the clues I managed to uncover--a three-book deal signed by the author, the cliffhanger ending to "Death's Head", the novel's subtitle: Book One of The Aux--it's easy to see that "Death's Head" is part of a series, and Mr. Gunn just wanted to save some revelations--Why did the Emperor specifically target Sven in the first place? What is that 1.8 percent of Sven's genetic makeup?--for later volumes, which is fine by me. Still, some more data would have been nice.

Of the science fiction elements, "Death's Head" utilizes a lot of familiar concepts--telepathy, artificial intelligences, talking guns with their own personalities, hive-mind collectives, cybernetic enhancements, planets with extreme biospheres, cloning, etc.,--and while the author doesn't really do anything new with these concepts, that doesn't make them any less entertaining. After all, the focus is not so much on coming up with original ideas and making them plausible, but more on placing Sven in difficult situations, arming him with exotic weaponry, and letting the fireworks fly!

Bottom line, David Gunn's "Death's Head" is a massively entertaining debut that kicks off The Aux series with a promising bang, and while the book may have its share of problems--storytelling, characterization, info-dumping--it's easy to overlook such issues when "Death's Head" is so damn fun to read...

FYI: "Death's Head" first came to my attention thanks to Neal Asher's review HERE and was released in May via Del Rey (USA) and Bantam Press (UK). Go pick up a copy today!

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Bobcasting (and Google Reader)

 
 

Sent to you by Jay via Google Reader:

 
 

via Seth's Blog by Seth Godin on Jul 28, 2007

I've been a fan of RSS for a long time, and I've been just waiting for it to reach its potential. Most of the readers of this blog read it via RSS, (if you don't, click here--more confusing than it needs to be, isn't it?)

Here's what's I think has been holding back RSS: the name (initials!) and the lack of a standard way to read a feed and to add a feed. We need one button, not twenty or thirty. I think both problems have been solved by RSS inside of Google Reader. (Click the link for a lens on an any easy way to get started). As the acceptance of Google Reader approaches ubiquity, marketers and managers now have the chance to take this technology to a totally new place.

Dave Winer, the pioneer of RSS, had a brilliancy about seven years ago that led to podcasting. Podcasting is just an RSS feed of music, with an easy interface (iTunes). Podcasting took off because it had the good parts of RSS without the hassles. But that's music, not text.

I want to suggest something that takes no new technology but could have a big impact on the way you do business: Bobcasting.

I call it that because instead of reaching the masses, it's just about reaching Bob. Or Tiasha. Or any individual or small group.

The future of online communication is micro-pockets of people getting RSS feeds in their Google Reader or on their Google home page. Amazon updates? Bobcast em to me. Fogbugz summaries for the customer service manager? Bobcast her three times a day.

Yes, Twitter is just an example of Bobcasting, but with a different interface. You only twit the people who want to hear from you, and you do it without spam filters or other noise.

What happens to your team when you have an RSS feed that can put a message or update in front of them without noise? And because the Reader separates the inputs by source, I can queue up my messages from you and read them in sequence. Compare that to the noisy disaster we call an inbox.

Facebook feels seductive, until you realize that the messages from those hundreds of friends are all sort of BlendTecked together. Yes, the spam is missing, but so is control.

With Bobcasting, I can have a feed for my Fedex packages, a feed updating me on the status of my frequent flyer miles at American, a feed from the project manager on the construction of my treehouse... anything that is primarily a one way piece of communication, anything where status updates instead of dialog are the goal.

If we are really living in a one to one future, then Bob (and our interactions with him) represent the asset we need to obsess over. Using RSS and Google Reader (and yes, there will be other, better readers to come) to do Bobcasting feels like a smart asset to build.


 
 

Things you can do from here: